Conservation and green design. LED light source provides more uniform illumination, by using less power and provides better images, also be able to protect sensitive materials. Click here for more info.
Also digitise your photos without the need to remove it from the album, even while it is under the plastic cover without glare, preserving your precious album memories. Easy to use, no computer is required to operate. Fast scanning speed Ergonomic design for fast and efficient scanning, Scan speed only 3. Posted August 20, Share this post Link to post Share on other sites. Hallo, Look here: Interesting Leica gear.
Posted August 21, edited. Edited August 21, by swb. Posted August 21, Also make sure the scanner is connected by usb and powered on when starting Vuescan. I've just said it isn't as simple as just installing the driver Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. No problems once the Silverfast was loaded Hello guest! Join the conversation You can post now and register later. Reply to this topic Go To Topic Listing. But those who have some small film strips mixed with some single images will be better off with such an adapter, even though the insertion is a little fiddly.
Compared to the previous model, the software equipment of the Plustek OptikFilm i has also not changed.
Plustek OpticFilm 7600i SE Film Scanner Review
But this also must not be, as the package is all around satisfying: in the scope of delivery, there is the QuickScan-programe, the NewSoft Tools Presto! Imagefolio, Presto! PageManager and Presto! Therewith, Plustek provides every software needed for the scanning. As already mentioned, QuickScan is apt for the fast and easy digitalization of film material, but it hardly offers possibilities for the adjustment. ImageFolio is a simple image processing programe that has a function volume that is barely beyond the MS-paint programe that is inclued in Windows.
But therefore, it is provided for free within the scope of delivery. With the PageManager, it is possible to administer one's documents as images and text documents, send them right to the suitable programes or generate PDFs from the scans with Quickscan. The also included ImageExplorer is a programe with which one can view and sort one's images. SilverFast is a very comprehensive scan-software that, after some time to get introduced into the programe, can also be well handled by a beginner.
It offers all possibilities to the professional user for optimizing the scans. It enables the scanning with MultiExposure and MultiSampling. With the version 6. More information about SilverFast and the different versions can be found in our website about SilverFast. In total, it can be said that the Plustek i is delivered with an excellent software package. SilverFast Ai Studio is the ultimative scan-software and also the other tools a very useful. Now we come to the most important part of our test that is the image quality of the Plustek OpticFilm i.
According to the producer, the image quality has been optimized and the deficits as for example the bad working dust and scratch correction of the previous model have been eliminated. Now we will see if this also applies in practice. We start with the resolution test: during a test scan with the USAF target with a maximum resolution of ppi, the horizontal and vertical lines of the element 6. According to our Resolution Table this results in an effective resolution of about ppi. Compared to the previous model Plustek OpticFilm i, the effective resolution of dpi has worsen to dpi.
But still, the resolution of dpi is an acceptable value and still higher than the one of some other scanners. A small format image that is scanned with ppi provides a digital image file of approximately 14 megapixels, thus sufficiently big image files for big enlargements and high quality image copies up to a DIN A4 21 x 29,7 cm format. This has a decisive disadvantage for the user: by scanning a small format image of ppi, one gets a huge image file with approximately 70 megapixels. Such an image file needs megabytes of memory, in case of a scanner with a colour depth of 48 bits even megabytes of memory respectively.
In order to handle and to process such data, a very fast computer and a lot of memory space in the hard disc are needed. In addition to that, the image data are only inflated, as, instead an actual image information of 14 megapixels, one saves 70 megapixels, thus five times more.
If a scanner with a nominal resolution of dpi provides in practice a resolution of only dpi, then it is obvious to scan with half of the resolution of dpi. But a scan with effective dpi results in an image file of only about 9 megapixels, this is clearly below the level of a digital camera. Thus, in order to keep the actual resolution of dpi, one has to scan with dpi; this results in very long scanning times, as we will see in the chapter Scanning-Speed. In order to give an impression of the image quality of the OpticFilm i, we will use the image shown here: thereby, we have a deeper look to the three marked outcuts in order to evaluate the different aspects of the achievable image quality and compare it to the one of the other scanners.
Shop by category
The most weak point of the OpticFilm i was the useless dust and scratch correction based on the hardware. According to the producer, in the new model, the infrared channel needed for that has been revised and is now supposed to provide some better results. The results of our tests were as follows: the iSRD-function has really improved!
Now, it does not generate any image errors caused by the removal of the fine image details, and a big part of the dust particles are eliminated. But the results are still not comparable with the ones of a Nikon scanner. In the adjacent example that shows an enlargement of the first marked image cutout above, it is visible that the Reflecta CrystalScan certainly also did not remove all the dust particles on the film surface of the scanned slide, but it still removed more interferences than the Plustek OpticFilm i did.
A scan with the Nikon Super Coolscan with an activated ICE-function does not have any image interferences anymore and practically represents the optimal solution of an implemented automatic dust and scratch corrector. Click on the thumbnail and the opening image switches every three seconds between the scans done with the Plustek OpticFilm i, the Reflecta CrytalScan and the Nikon Super Coolscan What also stands out in a negative way is also the blurring of the scans done with the Plustek OpticFilm i.
- how to install flash player on mac os x 10.4.11?
- save pdf as text file mac.
- install netgear router on mac!
- Plustek OpticFilm i SE Scanner for sale online | eBay.
- Join the conversation.
The adjacent enlargement of the second cutout illustrates this circumstance: the high sharpness of the Nikon Super Coolscan is not achieved. The scan with CrystalScan appears less sharp than the one of the Nikon, and the scan with the OpticFilm i shows a clear blurring in comparison. In order to discard that we used a defect Plustek-model in our test, we repeated the test with a second and a third device: the result is the same as it is shown in the image.
All scans were of course accomplished without any software-based sharpening. Thus, in case of the Plustek OpticFilm i, one should not miss to add a slight unsharp masking. In the third adjacent example that shows the enlargement of the third image cutout, the image results of the dark image areas of the three above mentioned scanners are compared: Nikon Super Coolscan , Reflecta CrystalScan and Plustek OpticFilm i.
All scans were accomplished without MultiExposure. It is clearly visible that here, the Nikon-device is unbeaten and that it fully plays its huge dynamic range. The clearly cheaper scanners Reflecta CrystalScan and Plustek OpticFilm i are quite equivalent in this discipline, whereby the Reflecta-device generates some more image noise. The density of the Plustek OpticFilm i has not changed in comparison to the previous model OpticFilm i: the lights and the shades have sufficient drawing. In a simple scan, the OpticFilm i still has the disturbing peculiarity as the previous model had: the shady areas appear very dull.
But in case of the new modell, a MultiExposure-scan will help out. Contrary to the OpticFilm i where the Multi-Exposure did practically not provide any improvement, the MultiExposure scan with the new model has now the effect that the shades are clearly more defined and much less dull.
This is also demonstrated in the third image cutour of the adjacent picture. Here, the representation changes between the scan with and the scan without the MultiExposure. But in the case of the i, the dynamic range can also not be increased with the MultiExposure. Conclusion: The image quality itself has improved in the new model to that effect that the dust and scratch correction provides now some useful results. But unfortunately, compared to the other scanners, it still does not work in a satisfying way.
Thus, also in case of the new model it is still necessary to accomplish a retouching image processing programe after the scanning. But it is now required in a much lower extent as it was the case in the previous model. The resolution and the dynamic range are quite good for a scanner of such a price category. The slight blurring of the scans should be still improved in the follwing model.
In order to detect the scanning times shown in the follwing tables, the scanner has been connected via USB 2.
Plustek OpticFilm 7600i Driver
We first present the times for the scanning of the negatives:. What is outstanding is that the digitalization of the slides and negatives practically takes the same time. In this concern, the previous model made some more or less clear differences. Also other scanners have clearly longer scanning times for the negatives compared to the scanning times needed for the positives.
Buy Scanner Software for Plustek - better Scan Results with SilverFast
But unfortunately, the OpticFilm i is not faster than its previous model, although the comparison of the figures mentioned in the tables show an increase in the speed. The shorter scanning times of the scans done with iSRD are due to the fact that we detected the times with a much faster computer, so that the analysis on the infrared channel took place much faster. A scan without iSRD takes as much time as it is the case with the old model, as there is not much to calculate in a normal scan but the scanner itself requires time.
For comparison, we connected the scanner to the same computer with which we measured the scanning times of the previous model: the times barely differ from each other compared to the i.
A scan with full resolution and an activated iSRD-function also still takes some good 11 minutes in connection to a current top-computer with the Plustek OpticFilm i. The Reflecta CrystalScan needs for a scan in the maximum resolution also ppi clearly less time with 8 minutes.